After nearly two decades on death row, Richard Bernard Moore, 57, will face a literal firing squad for the murder of a convenience store clerk.
Moore could face a choice between the electric chair and the firing squad, two options available to death row prisoners after legislators altered the state’s capital punishment law last year in an effort to work around a decade-long pause in executions, attributed to the corrections agency’s inability to procure lethal injection drugs.
The new law made the electric chair the state’s primary means of execution while giving prisoners the option of choosing death by firing squad or lethal injection, if those methods are available.
The state corrections agency said last month it had finished developing protocols for firing squad executions and completed $53,600 in renovations on the death chamber in Columbia, installing a metal chair with restraints that faces a wall with a rectangular opening 15 feet (4.6 meters) away.
In the case of a firing squad execution, three volunteer shooters — all Corrections Department employees — will have rifles loaded with live ammunition, with their weapons trained on the inmate’s heart. A hood will be placed over the head of the inmate, who will be given the opportunity to make a last statement.
South Carolina is one of eight states to still use the electric chair and one of four to allow a firing squad, according to the Washington-based nonprofit Death Penalty Information Center.
Moore is one of 35 men on South Carolina’s death row. He exhausted his federal appeals in 2020, and the state Supreme Court denied another appeal this week.
Lindsey Vann, an attorney for Moore, said Thursday she will ask the court to stay the execution.
The state last scheduled an execution for Moore in 2020, which was then delayed after prison officials said they couldn’t obtain lethal injection drugs.
During Moore’s 2001 trial, prosecutors said Moore entered the store looking for money to support his cocaine habit and got into a dispute with Mahoney, who drew a pistol that Moore wrestled away from him.
Mahoney pulled a second gun, and a gunfight ensued. Mahoney shot Moore in the arm, and Moore shot Mahoney in the chest. Prosecutors said Moore left a trail of blood through the store as he looked for cash, stepping twice over Mahoney.
At the time, Moore claimed that he acted in self-defense after Mahoney drew the first gun.
Moore’s supporters have argued his crime doesn’t rise to the level of heinousness in other death penalty cases in the state. His appeals lawyers have said that because Moore didn’t bring a gun into store, he couldn’t have intended to kill someone when he walked in.
South Carolina’s last execution was in 2011, when Jeffrey Motts, on death row for strangling a cellmate while serving a life sentence for another murder, abandoned his appeals and opted for the death chamber.
WHY DO THEY GET TO DECIDE? Their victims had no choice.. Whatever happened to “You give up your rights when U commit a crime??
The person who died did not get a choice,
I would LOVE to have top demon rats put to the wall NOW! They are responsible for at least 100k deaths directly because of their forcible poison vaccine mandates!!
Actually in the case of Moore, the victim did have a choice. Moore did not bring a gun to the crime. The gun was the victim’s personal weapon. Victim must have drawn his weapon then failed to go through with shooting it which was why it was wrestled from him. Then victim drew a second gun and started a gun fight where victim was killed. Had the victim given the Moore the money, and had security cameras to show Moore, both would be alive today with neither on death row. If you are being robbed, do not resist. Give it over and report it to authorities.
Well you have plenty of time to figure that out!maybe they could have had coffee and talk of over!if he didn’t rob the place both would be alive!what a concept,eh?