In a recent legal development, a federal judge has delivered a significant victory to SpaceX by granting a reprieve in the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) lawsuit against the company. The lawsuit, filed in August, alleged hiring discrimination against asylum recipients and refugees, accusing SpaceX of actively discouraging them from applying for jobs.

The DOJ’s administrative lawsuit claimed that SpaceX violated the Immigration and Nationality Act by allegedly discouraging asylees and refugees from seeking employment with the company. The allegations were based on comments made by SpaceX CEO Elon Musk and the content of the company’s job postings. SpaceX, however, denied any wrongdoing and countered with its own lawsuit in September, arguing that the administrative case was unconstitutional.

The recent ruling by Judge Rolando Olvera of the Southern District of Texas has temporarily halted the DOJ’s lawsuit. Judge Olvera blocked the case from moving forward, stating that the administrative law judges overseeing the matter overstepped their legal authority. The judge argued that such powers should be reserved for officials appointed by the president, not those appointed by the attorney general.

This legal reprieve marks a pivotal moment for SpaceX in its legal battle against the DOJ. Elon Musk, known for his outspoken nature, had previously hit back at the DOJ over the allegations of hiring discrimination. SpaceX has not immediately responded to the recent ruling, leaving uncertainty about the company’s stance and potential next steps.

The DOJ’s lawsuit contended that SpaceX’s hiring practices were flawed due to a misinterpretation of export control laws restricting access to sensitive technologies. According to the DOJ, the company wrongly asserted that it could only hire U.S. citizens and legal permanent residents, commonly known as green card holders.

The lawsuit highlighted public remarks and job postings by SpaceX, where the company stated it could only hire individuals with U.S. citizenship or green card status. Elon Musk’s 2020 tweet, stating that “US law requires at least a green card to be hired at SpaceX, as rockets are considered advanced weapons technology,” was cited in the lawsuit. References to International Traffic in Arms Regulations and export control rules were also included.

As the legal battle unfolds, it remains to be seen how the DOJ will respond to the federal judge’s ruling and what steps SpaceX will take in light of this temporary reprieve. The outcome of this case could have broader implications for the intersection of immigration law, employment practices, and national security concerns in the aerospace industry. SpaceX, amidst these legal challenges, continues its ambitious pursuits in space exploration, recently launching its 29th commercial resupply mission to the International Space Station.