The FBI Released a Big Foot Report! (VIDEO)

Legends of elusive and large, ape-like creatures have captured the imagination of people worldwide for centuries. In the United States, the iconic representation of this mysterious creature is known as Bigfoot.

Interestingly, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) became entangled in the realm of Bigfoot in 1976 when renowned Bigfoot researcher Peter Byrne sought the bureau’s assistance in analyzing hair samples.

Although the outcome was not groundbreaking, the story of the FBI’s involvement in the investigation sheds light on the cultural significance and intrigue surrounding Bigfoot.

The Fascination with Bigfoot

During the 1970s, Bigfoot gained significant popularity, captivating the public’s imagination. Notably, the release of a video in 1967, showing what appeared to be a Bigfoot sighting in Northern California, further fueled the curiosity and belief in the creature’s existence.

However, skepticism prevailed, as the original evidence of oversized footprints discovered in 1958 was exposed as a prank in 2002. Similarly, some questioned the authenticity of the Patterson-Gimlin film. Despite the doubts, Bigfoot continued to capture the attention of researchers and enthusiasts alike.

The FBI’s Encounter with Bigfoot

In 1976, Peter Byrne, Director of the Bigfoot Information Center and Exhibition in Oregon, sent a sample of hair attached to a piece of skin to the FBI for analysis.

Byrne, a prominent figure in the Bigfoot research community at the time, hoped that the FBI could shed light on the mysterious origin of the sample. Jay Cochran, Jr., assistant director of the FBI’s scientific and technical services division, responded to Byrne, stating that while analyzing Bigfoot hair was not the FBI’s usual domain, an exception would be made in this case.

The Verdict: Deer Hair

In early 1977, Cochran concluded the analysis and informed Byrne that the hair samples were of deer origin, not from the mythical Bigfoot creature.

The FBI’s involvement was merely a gesture of scientific inquiry and research, not an endorsement of Bigfoot’s existence. The bureau declassified its “Bigfoot file” several decades later, revealing the correspondence between Byrne and the FBI.

Misinterpretation and Public Perception

While the FBI’s involvement was limited to a single hair analysis, some Bigfoot enthusiasts might misinterpret it as an endorsement of Bigfoot’s reality. Benjamin Radford, deputy editor of Skeptical Inquirer magazine, cautions against misconstruing the situation.

He highlights that the FBI’s analysis was a favor extended to a Bigfoot researcher and should not be considered as definitive evidence for Bigfoot’s existence. The case bears similarities to the military’s investigation of UFOs, which does not equate to confirming the existence of extraterrestrial life.

The Intriguing Mystery Continues

Adding a layer of intrigue to the story, Byrne, now 93 years old, does not seem to recall receiving the FBI’s conclusion that the hair was actually from a deer.

While there might be speculation about his response, it is important to remember that the significance of the FBI’s involvement lies more in the cultural fascination with Bigfoot than in confirming its existence.

Leave a Reply

Powered by

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: