Terrified SCOTUS Judge Refuses to Use the Word “Woman”

In a baffling move, the Supreme Court Justice who was nominated explicitly based on her race and sex has once again refused to acknowledge the very group she supposedly represents. For the second time in her short tenure, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has ignored the term “women” in her official capacity. This latest snub came in her concurring opinion in Moyle v. United States, released on Thursday.

Jackson, along with Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Amy Coney Barrett, Brett Kavanaugh, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan, opted to delay a ruling on the Biden administration’s controversial use of the 1986 Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) to push an extreme abortion agenda in pro-life states. In her concurring opinion, Jackson claimed that Idaho’s popular lifesaving law posed a threat to women, yet she conspicuously avoided using the word “women,” instead referring to them as “pregnant patients.”

Throughout her eight-page opinion, Jackson consistently referred to those most affected by Idaho’s law as “pregnant patients.” This terminology not only reduces women to a clinical term but also erases the unique biological role they play in conceiving and birthing children.

“Today’s decision is not a victory for pregnant patients in Idaho. It is a delay. While this Court dawdles and the country waits, pregnant people experiencing emergency medical conditions remain in a precarious position, as their doctors are kept in the dark about what the law requires,” Jackson wrote.

By framing the situation this way, Jackson dismisses the significant achievements of Idaho’s pro-life law, which has saved hundreds of lives. Moreover, she perpetuates a misleading narrative about the care women and their unborn children receive in states with pro-life protections during pregnancy-related emergencies.

“This Court had a chance to bring clarity and certainty to this tragic situation, and we have squandered it. And for as long as we refuse to declare what the law requires, pregnant patients in Idaho, Texas, and elsewhere will be paying the price,” she stated.

Jackson’s opinion aligns closely with the Biden administration’s talking points, suggesting that complications like preeclampsia, preterm premature rupture of membranes, sepsis, and placental abruption force women to choose between their own lives and those of their unborn children. This is a false dichotomy. With proper medical intervention, many women and babies have survived these complications, underscoring the importance of prioritizing both lives.

It is worth noting that Jackson’s confirmation to the U.S. Supreme Court in 2022 was marred by her refusal to define what a woman is, claiming she was “not a biologist.” Since then, she has demonstrated a troubling pattern of ignoring biological realities in favor of leftist revisionism. Her language swap from “women” to “patients” reflects this disturbing trend.

In June 2023, Jackson argued in favor of institutional racism, following which she committed several ethics violations amidst baseless smears against Republican-nominated justices. During the court’s most recent term, she also complained about the Constitution and botched her attempt to regurgitate Democrat and corporate media talking points about Jan. 6.

Justice Jackson’s continued refusal to acknowledge the fundamental truth of biological sex is a disservice to the very women she claims to represent. Her feigned ignorance and activist language undermine the integrity of the Supreme Court and the rights of women everywhere. It’s high time we demand better from those who hold the highest judicial positions in our land.