An 11-year-old boy was killed by a train while walking to school after investigators concluded he was likely distracted by his cellphone as he stepped onto a railroad crossing with no gates or warning lights.
Jaiden Shehata was struck at the Bourneview footpath crossing near Kenley in South London.
He was just 11 years old.
The Riddlesdown Collegiate student was making a trip he had taken many times before when he began crossing the tracks shortly after 8 a.m.
A passenger train was approaching at roughly 50 mph.
According to Britain’s Rail Accident Investigation Branch, surveillance footage showed Jaiden holding what appeared to be his phone as he entered the crossing. Investigators later determined a video was likely playing on the device at the time.
The train engineer spotted the boy entering the tracks and immediately sounded the horn and applied the emergency brake.
Jaiden looked up.
But there was not enough time.
The train struck him before he could clear the tracks. Investigators said he suffered fatal injuries, and the recent coroner’s hearing listed severe neck injuries as the cause of death.
The tragedy has now led to renewed scrutiny of the crossing itself.
Unlike many railroad crossings familiar to Americans, Bourneview was a pedestrian-only “passive” crossing. At the time of Jaiden’s death, it had no automatic gates, flashing lights or active signal telling pedestrians when a train was coming.
Instead, people were expected to stop, look and listen before crossing.
RAIB concluded that Jaiden probably did not recognize the danger of the approaching train because he was distracted by his phone — but investigators also found that the crossing’s design contributed to the accident.
Officials specifically identified the lack of an active warning system as a probable causal factor.
The crossing itself had already been considered relatively high risk.
Evidence presented at the inquest showed it had been ranked 13th most dangerous among 111 footpath crossings on Network Rail’s Sussex route.
A 2023 risk assessment had already identified possible safety upgrades, including improved signs and miniature stop lights that would display red or green indications to pedestrians.
Investigators also raised concerns about the physical layout.
The fence and gate were described as old and not particularly imposing, while the muddy, sloping path could encourage pedestrians to look downward at their footing instead of toward warning signs or approaching trains.
Jaiden’s death ultimately accelerated changes.
Network Rail has since carried out safety work that includes warning equipment designed to tell pedestrians when it is safe to cross.
The crossing remains closed while officials continue working with nearby schools on rail-safety education before reopening it.
At the Sept. 24 inquest, senior coroner Sarah Ormond-Walshe concluded that Jaiden’s death was accidental.
She found that his cellphone distraction and the absence of an active warning system both played a role.
But she also delivered an emotional message to his grieving family.
“Everybody, everybody, looks at their phone,” she said.
She urged them not to blame the child for doing something almost everyone does.
“He was only 11 years old,” she added.
The case has since become part of a broader warning from British rail investigators about the dangers of passive crossings.
RAIB noted in its latest annual report that several fatal incidents at pedestrian crossings occurred during 2025 and early 2026, highlighting what the agency called the “inherent risk” associated with crossings that depend entirely on users noticing approaching trains themselves.
For Jaiden’s family, the safety changes came too late.
Discover more from
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

